web analytics

Tag-Archive for » obsolete «

Reality Check

Quoted at SXSW, Vic Gundotra of Google+ responded to criticism about G+ and its popularity, or more pointedly, lack thereof.

“Make sure you’re using it correctly,” the man joked.

It’s not the public’s responsibility to use a service in a way it was designed to be used. It’s a service company’s responsibility to adapt to the ways in which its public uses a service.

By staunchly refusing to open its API to innovative pioneers who long to bring some sort of functionality to the service that already exists on other websites, by closed-mindedly limiting the few ways in which one can use the website, by refusing to bring uniformity to its layout and making people guess in what way they’re supposed to use something that’s presented, you’re really killing your own audience’s enthusiasm.

It’s been a year, Google. Do something while you still can. Otherwise, G+ is doomed.

Probably related:


I’m Still Waiting

Hey! Psst! Google Android tablet makers! You really want me to buy one of your products, right?

Then stop shipping and schlepping devices that are running Android version 2.2. The newest, four months old, is 4.something, “Ice Cream Sandwich”.

Running 2.2, or even 2.3?

That’s like making computers with Windows 98 (released in 1998), when most geeks prefer Windows XP (released at the turn of the century) or Windows 7 (released most recently).

What the heck, Android tablet makers??

Probably related:


Google Minus

I deleted my Google+ profile. I got it about five months ago when it became available to the public, and I wanted to see what it was about. I added some of my Facebook friends, added other individuals I was curious about, and I waited to see if I’d grow as attached to that as other social networks.

I have to say that the service is redundant, offers nothing that another social network doesn’t already fulfill in my online pursuits, and their features are comparatively scrawny and uninspired. I posted this graphic after about a month of being on there:

I’d have to say that sums up my experiences. It was common to see friends’ updates from a month ago still hovering near the top of the page. Perhaps the friends I roll with just prefer Facebook, but nobody I was following updated very often. It was hard to entice anyone I knew to use G+ in addition to or instead of Facebook.

Nice try, Google. Next time, give us features no other website has. Sometimes Google really has their fingers on the pulse of what people want. Othertimes, like this, it leaves one scratching one’s head.

Probably related:


Ding, Dong, the Bloatware’s Dead…

Adobe is going to dump Flash, and go with HTML5. Anyone who is surprised by this, raise your hand. *crickets* I thought so.

Probably related:


obsolete technology

More and more, I find myself wondering if people still use certain things, certain websites, that have been around for years, but are hardly a part of my world any longer. Admitting that I ever used these services gives me the connotation of wearing my pants up to my chest and complaining about youngsters on the lawn, but anyway…

AIM was one of the first instant text messengers out there. I stopped using it because all my friends drifted to Yahoo IM, Google Talk, and Skype, and others barely bother with anything more involved than the chat option on Facebook, wishing to install as few accessory programs on one’s system as possible. Thinking back, I haven’t logged into an AIM account for over two years.

Email was one of the earliest ways to contact people online in a more private manner than a public message board. You’re still required to own an email address in order to sign up for various things like Facebook, Twitter, and even domain names and webspace. I’m also noticing more and more that various websites out there who want you to “sign up/sign in” allow you to do so with your authenticated Facebook, as an alternate option to using your email address. I personally don’t have conversations by email anymore, it’s all through instant messengers and, more commonly, Facebook.

Myspace has certainly jumped the shark, with so many other, better organized social networks to play with. Bands no longer advertise their Myspace URL, opting instead for Facebook, Twitter, or their own domain name. It’s funny how it went from being full of people to being mainly full of musicians. At least, as far as I can tell with all the articles I’ve read. I haven’t personally logged into that for a number of years. I don’t even think I could remember the email address with which I signed up for it.

I’m almost ready to add Twitter to the defunct pile. I barely use it anymore in a personal venue–I am happy to subscribe to the profiles of companies who tweet sparingly and with news I am amused by or interested in. However, I am noticing that I am following fewer and fewer humans. And I’m turned off by people who automatically spam their twitter accounts with shortened URLs to existing webpages and articles. “Click here to read about blah on my website.” If I’d wanted to read your website, I would have subscribed to your website. Of course, I do this myself so I’m strangely hypocritical on that one, hehe. I’m also very, very turned off by companies who follow my profile out of the blue. I generally block any account that follows my profile without provocation or action on my part. Don’t call me, I’ll call you. Go work on your Google SEO so that I can find you. Stop using my Twitter profile to sell me stuff. It’s very bad manners, to my perception.

I find it interesting how new technologies, services, and websites have slithered their way into my daily usage, and taken over interest once held by old mainstays. Facebook, which I was resistant to for years because I just couldn’t grok the idea of a shared “wall”, has become one of my main, and sometimes only, common internet destination.

Probably related: